Attorney - Hospice Fraud - A review For Employees, Whistleblowers, Attorneys, Lawyers and Law FirmsGood evening. Today, I discovered Attorney - Hospice Fraud - A review For Employees, Whistleblowers, Attorneys, Lawyers and Law Firms. Which is very helpful for me and also you. |
|
|
Hospice fraud in South Carolina and the United States is an addition problem as the whole of hospice patients has exploded over the past few years. From 2004 to 2008, the whole of patients receiving hospice care in the United States grew approximately 40% to nearly 1.5 million, and of the 2.5 million citizen who died in 2008, nearly one million were hospice patients. The splendid majority of citizen receiving hospice care receive federal benefits from the federal government straight through the Medicare or Medicaid programs. The condition care providers who furnish hospice services traditionally enroll in the Medicare and Medicaid programs in order to qualify to receive payments under these government programs for services rendered to Medicare and Medicaid eligible patients. What I said. It isn't the final outcome that the true about Attorney. You check out this article for home elevators what you want to know is Attorney.AttorneyWhile most hospice condition care organizations furnish proper and ethical treatment for their hospice patients, because hospice eligibility under Medicare and Medicaid involves clinical judgments which may corollary in the payments of large sums of money from the federal government, there are large opportunities for fraudulent practices and false billing claims by unscrupulous hospice care providers. As new federal hospice fraud promulgation actions have demonstrated, the whole of condition care clubs and individuals who are willing to try to defraud the Medicare and Medicaid hospice benefits programs is on the rise. A new example of hospice fraud enchanting a South Carolina hospice is Southern Care, Inc., a hospice business that in 2009 paid .7 million to rule an Fca case. The defendant operated hospices in 14 other states, too, along with Alabama, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, Virginia and Wisconsin. The alleged frauds were that patients were not eligible for hospice, to wit, were not terminally ill, lack of documentation of final illnesses, and that the business marketed to inherent patients with the promise of free medications, supplies, and the provision of home condition aides. Southern Care also entered into a 5-year Corporate Integrity trade with the Oig as part of the settlement. The qui tam relators received approximately million. Understanding the Consequences of Hospice Fraud and Whistleblower Actions U.S. And South Carolina consumers, along with hospice patients and their house members, and condition care employees who are employed in the hospice industry, as well as their Sc lawyers and attorneys, should acquaint themselves with the basics of the hospice care industry, hospice eligibility under the Medicare and Medicaid programs, and hospice fraud schemes that have industrialized over the country. Consumers need to safe themselves from unethical hospice providers, and hospice employees need to guard against knowingly or unwittingly participating in condition care fraud against the federal government because they may branch themselves to menagerial sanctions, along with lengthy exclusions from working in an club which receives federal funds, large civil monetary penalties and fines, and criminal sanctions, along with incarceration. When a hospice worker discovers fraudulent guide enchanting Medicare or Medicaid billings or claims, the worker should not partake in such behavior, and it is imperative that the unlawful guide be reported to law promulgation and/or regulatory authorities. Not only does reporting such fraudulent Medicare or Medicaid practices shield the hospice worker from exposure to the foregoing administrative, civil and criminal sanctions, but hospice fraud whistleblowers may benefit financially under the recompense provisions of the federal False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3732, by bringing false claims suits, also known as qui tam or whistleblower suits, against their employers on behalf of the United States. Types of Hospice Care Services Hospice care is a type of condition care service for patients who are terminally ill. Hospices also furnish support services for the families of terminally ill patients. This care includes physical care and counseling. Hospice care is ordinarily in case,granted by a social agency or incommunicable business stylish by Medicare and Medicaid. Hospice care is ready for all age groups, along with children, adults, and the elderly who are in the final stages of life. The purpose of hospice is to furnish care for the terminally ill patient and his or her house and not to cure the final illness. If a patient qualifies for hospice care, the patient can receive medical and support services, along with nursing care, medical social services, doctor services, counseling, homemaker services, and other types of services. The hospice patient will have a team of doctors, nurses, home condition aides, social workers, counselors and trained volunteers to help the patient and his or her house members cope with the symptoms and consequences of the final illness. While many hospice patients and their families can receive hospice care in the ease of their home, if the hospice patient's condition deteriorates, the patient can be transferred to a hospice facility, hospital, or nursing home to receive hospice care. Hospice Care Statistics The whole of days that a patient receives hospice care is often referenced as the "length of stay" or "length of service." The distance of service is dependent on a whole of dissimilar factors, along with but not minuscule to, the type and stage of the disease, the ability of and entrance to condition care providers before the hospice referral, and the timing of the hospice referral. In 2008, the median distance of stay for hospice patients was about 21 days, the median distance of stay was about 69 days, approximately 35% of hospice patients died or were discharged within 7 days of the hospice referral, and only about 12% of hospice patients survived longer than 180 days. Most hospice care patients receive hospice care in incommunicable homes (40%). Other locations where hospice services are in case,granted are nursing homes (22%), residential facilities (6%), hospice patient facilities (21%), and acute care hospitals (10%). Hospice patients are generally the elderly, and hospice age group percentages are 34 years or less (1%), 35 - 64 years (16%), 65 - 74 years (16%), 75 - 84 years (29%), and over 85 years (38%). As for the final illness resulting in a hospice referral, cancer is the determination for approximately 40% of hospice patients, followed by debility unspecified (15%), heart disease (12%), dementia (11%), lung disease (8%), stroke (4%) and kidney disease (3%). Medicare pays the great majority of hospice care expenses (84%), followed by incommunicable insurance (8%), Medicaid (5%), charity care (1%) and self pay (1%). As of 2008, there were approximately 4,700 locations which were providing hospice care in the United States, which represented about a 50% growth over ten years. There were about 3,700 clubs and organizations which were providing hospice services in the United States. About half of the hospice care providers in the United States are for-profit organizations, and about half are non-profit organizations.
In 1965, Congress established the Medicare agenda to furnish condition insurance for the elderly and disabled. Payments from the Medicare agenda arise from the Medicare Trust fund, which is funded by government contributions and straight through payroll deductions from American workers. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (Cms), previously known as the condition Care Financing administration (Hcfa), is the federal agency within the United States agency of condition and Human Services (Hhs) that administers the Medicare agenda and works in partnership with state governments to administer Medicaid. In 2007, Cms reorganized its ten geography-based field offices to a Consortia structure based on the agency's key lines of business: Medicare condition plans, Medicare financial management, Medicare fee for service operations, Medicaid and children's health, eye & certification and ability improvement. The Cms consortia consist of the following: • Consortium for Medicare condition Plans Operations
Each consortium is led by a Consortium Administrator (Ca) who serves as the Cms's national focal point in the field for their business line. Each Ca is responsible for consistent implementation of Cms programs, procedure and guidance over all ten regions for matters pertaining to their business line. In addition to accountability for a business line, each Ca also serves as the Agency's senior administration valid for two or three Regional Offices (Ros), representing the Cms Administrator in external matters and overseeing menagerial operations. Much of the daily administration and carrying out of the Medicare agenda is managed straight through incommunicable insurance clubs that covenant with the Government. These incommunicable insurance companies, sometimes called "Medicare Carriers" or "Fiscal Intermediaries," are expensed with and responsible for accepting Medicare claims, determining coverage, and manufacture payments from the Medicare Trust Fund. These carriers, along with Palmetto Government Benefits Administrators (hereinafter "Pgba"), a agency of Blue Cross and Blue Shield of South Carolina, operate pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1395h and 1395u and rely on the good faith and right representations of condition care providers when processing claims. Over the past forty years, the Medicare agenda has enabled the elderly and disabled to get principal medical services from medical providers throughout the United States. principal to the success of the Medicare agenda is the basic thought that condition care providers accurately and indeed submit claims and bills to the Medicare Trust Fund only for those medical treatments or services that are legitimate, inexpensive and medically necessary, in full compliance with all laws, regulations, rules, and conditions of participation, and, further, that medical providers not take benefit of their elderly and disabled patients. The Medicaid agenda is ready only to distinct low-income individuals and families who must meet eligibility requirements set forth by federal and state law. Each state sets its own guidelines concerning eligibility and services. Although administered by private states, the Medicaid agenda is funded primarily by the federal government. Medicaid does not pay money to patients; rather, it sends payments directly to the patient's condition care providers. Like Medicare, the Medicaid agenda depends on condition care providers to accurately and indeed submit claims and bills to agenda administrators only for those medical treatments or services that are legitimate, inexpensive and medically necessary, in full compliance with all laws, regulations, rules, and conditions of participation, and, further, that medical providers not take benefit of their indigent patients. Medicare & Medicaid Hospice Laws Which work on Sc Hospices Hospice fraud occurs when hospice organizations, by and straight through their employees, agents and owners, knowingly violate the terms and conditions of the applicable Medicare and Medicaid hospice statutes, regulations, rules and conditions of participation. In order to be able to identify hospice fraud, hospices, hospice patients, hospice employees and their attorneys and lawyers must know the Medicare laws and requirements relating to hospice care benefits. Medicare's two main sources of authorization for hospice benefits are found in the social safety Act and the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations. The statutory provisions are primarily found at 42 U.S.C. §§ 1395d, 1395e, 1395f(a)(7), 1395x(d)(d), and 1395y, and the regulatory provisions are found at 42 C.F.R. Part 418. To be eligible for Medicare benefits for hospice care, the patient must be eligible for Medicare Part A and be terminally ill. 42 C.F.R. § 418.20. final illness is established when "the private has a medical determination that his or her life expectancy is 6 months or less if the illness runs its normal course." 42 C.F.R. § 418.3; 42 U.S.C. § 1395x(d)(d)(3). The patient's doctor and the medical director of the hospice must certify in writing that the patient is "terminally ill." 42 U.S.C. § 1395f(a)(7); 42 C.F.R. § 418.20. After a patient's initial certification, Medicare provides for two ninety-day benefit periods followed by an unlimited whole of sixty-day benefit periods. 42 U.S.C. § 1395d(a)(4). At the end of each ninety- or sixty-day period, the patient can be re-certified only if at that time he or she has less than six months to live if the illness runs its normal course. 42 U.S.C. § 1395f(a)(7)(A). The written certification and re-certifications must be maintained in the patient's medical records. 42 C.F.R. § 418.23. A written plan of care must be established for each patient setting forth the types of hospice care services the patient is scheduled to receive, 42 U.S.C. § 1395f(a)(7)(B), and the hospice care has to be in case,granted in accordance with such plan of care. 42 U.S.C. § 1395f(a)(7)(C); 42 C.F.R. § 418.56. Clinical records for each hospice patient must be maintained by the hospice, along with plan of care, assessments, clinical notes, signed consideration of election, patient responses to medication and therapy, doctor certifications and re-certifications, outcome data, progress directives and doctor orders. 42 C.F.R. § 418.104. The hospice must get a written consideration of election from the patient to elect to receive Medicare hospice benefits. 42 C.F.R. § 418.24. Importantly, once a patient has elected to receive hospice care benefits, the patient waives Medicare benefits for medical treatment for the final disease upon which is the admitting diagnosis. 42 C.F.R. § 418.24(d). The hospice must prescribe an Interdisciplinary Group (Idg) or groups composed of individuals who work together to meet the physical, medical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs of the hospice patients and families facing final illness and bereavement. 42 C.F.R. § 418.56. The Idg members must furnish the care and services offered by the hospice, and the group, in its entirety, must supervise the care and services. A registered nurse that is a member of the Idg must be designated to furnish coordination of care and to ensure continuous assessment of each patient's and family's needs and implementation of the interdisciplinary plan of care. The interdisciplinary group must include, but is not minuscule to, the following marvelous and competent professionals: (i) A doctor of treatment or osteopathy (who is an worker or under covenant with the hospice); (ii) A registered nurse; (iii) A social worker; and, (iv) A pastoral or other counselor. 42 C.F.R. § 418.56. The Medicare hospice regulations, at 42 C.F.R. § 418.200, summarize the requirements for hospice coverage in pertinent part as follows: To be covered, hospice services must meet the following requirements. They must be inexpensive and principal for the palliation and administration of the final illness as well as associated conditions. The private must elect hospice care in accordance with §418.24. A plan of care must be established and periodically reviewed by the attending physician, the medical director, and the interdisciplinary group of the hospice agenda as set forth in §418.56. That plan of care must be established before hospice care is provided. The services in case,granted must be consistent with the plan of care. A certification that the private is terminally ill must be completed as set forth in section §418.22. The social safety Act, at 42 U.S.C. § 1395y(a), limits Medicare hospice benefits, providing in pertinent part as follows: "Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, no cost may be made under part A or part B for any expenses incurred for items or services-... (C) in the case of hospice care, which are not inexpensive and principal for the palliation or administration of final illness...." 42 C.F.R. § 418.50 (hospice care must be "reasonable and principal for the palliation and administration of final illness"). Palliative care is defined in the regulations as "patient and family-centered care that optimizes ability of life by anticipating, preventing, and treating suffering. Palliative care throughout the continuum of illness involves addressing physical, intellectual, emotional, social, and spiritual needs and to facilitate patient autonomy, entrance to information, and choice." 42 C.F.R. § 418.3. Medicare pays hospice agencies a daily rate for each day a beneficiary is enrolled in the hospice benefit and receives hospice care. The daily payments are made regardless of the whole of services furnished on a given day and are intended to cover costs that the hospice incurs in furnishing services identified in the patient's plan of care. There are four levels of payments which are made based on the whole of care required to meet beneficiary and house needs. 42 C.F.R. § 418.302; Cms Hospice Fact Sheet, November 2009. These four levels, and the corresponding 2010 daily rates, are as follows: disposition home care (2.91); continuous home care (4.10); patient respite care (7.83); and, normal patient care (5.74). The compound every year cap per patient in 2009 was ,014.50. This cap is carefully by adjusting the traditional hospice patient cap of ,500, set in 1984, by the buyer Price Index. See Cms Internet-Only by hand 100-04, chapter 11, section 80.2; 42 U.S.C. § 1395f(i); 42 C.F.R. § 418.309. The Medicare Claims Processing Manual, at chapter 11 - Processing Hospice Claims, in Section 80.2, entitled "Cap on wide Hospice Reimbursement," provides in pertinent part as follows: "Any payments in excess of the cap must be refunded by the hospice." Hospice patients are responsible for Medicare co-insurance payments for drugs and respite care, and the hospice may charge the patient for these co-insurance payments. However, the co-insurance payments for drugs are minuscule to the lesser of or 5% of the cost of the drugs to the hospice, and the co-insurance payments for respite care are generally 5% of the cost made by Medicare for such services. 42 C.F.R. § 418.400. The Medicare and Medicaid programs wish institutional condition care providers, along with hospice organizations, to file an enrollment application in order to qualify to receive the programs' benefits. As part of these enrollment applications, the hospice providers certify that they will comply with Medicare and Medicaid laws, regulations, and agenda instructions, and additional certify that they understand that cost of a claim by Medicare and Medicaid is conditioned upon the claim and basic transaction complying with such agenda laws and requirements. The Medicare Enrollment Application which hospice providers must execute, Form Cms-855A, states in part as follows: "I agree to abide by the Medicare laws, regulations and agenda instructions that apply to this provider. The Medicare laws, regulations, and agenda instructions are ready straight through the Medicare contractor. I understand that cost of a claim by Medicare is conditioned upon the claim and the basic transaction complying with such laws, regulations, and agenda instructions (including, but not minuscule to, the Federal Aks and Stark laws), and on the provider's compliance with all applicable conditions of participation in Medicare." Hospices are generally required to bill Medicare on a monthly basis. See the Medicare Claims Processing Manual, at chapter 11 - Processing Hospice Claims, in Section 90 - Frequency of Billing. Hospices generally file their hospice Medicare claims with their Fiscal Intermediary or Medicare Carrier pursuant to the Cms Claims by hand Form Cms 1450 (sometime also called a Form Ub-04 or Form Ub-92), either in paper or electronic form. These claim forms include representations and certifications which state in pertinent part that: (1) misrepresentations or falsifications of principal facts may serve as the basis for civil monetary penalties and criminal convictions; (2) submission of the claim constitutes certification that the billing facts is true, definite and complete; (3) the submitter did not knowingly or recklessly disregard or misrepresent or conceal material facts; (4) all required doctor certifications and re-certifications are on file; (5) all required patient signatures are on file; and, (6) for Medicaid purposes, the submitter understands that because cost and pleasure of this claim will be from Federal and State funds, any false statements, documents, or concealment of a material fact are branch to prosecution under applicable Federal or State Laws. Hospices must also file with Cms an every year cost and data narrative of Medicare payments received. 42 U.S.C. § 1395f(i)(3); 42 U.S.C. § 1395x(d)(d)(4). The every year hospice cost and data reports, Form Cms 1984-99, include representations and certifications which state in pertinent part that: (1) misrepresentations or falsifications of facts contained in the cost narrative may be punishable by criminal, civil and menagerial actions, along with fines and/or imprisonment; (2) if any services identified in the narrative were the goods of a direct or indirect kickback or were otherwise illegal, then criminal, civil and menagerial actions may result, along with fines and/or imprisonment; (3) the narrative is a true, definite and unblemished statement ready from the books and records of the victualer in accordance with applicable instructions, except as noted; and, (4) the signing officer is familiar with the laws and regulations concerning the provision of condition care services and that the services identified in this cost narrative were in case,granted in compliance with such laws and regulations. Hospice Anti-Fraud promulgation Statutes There are a whole of federal criminal, civil and menagerial promulgation provisions set forth in the Medicare statutes which are aimed at preventing fraudulent conduct, along with hospice fraud, and which help sound agenda integrity and compliance. Some of the more important promulgation provisions of the Medicare statutes include the following: 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b (Criminal fraud and anti-kickback penalties); 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7a and 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-8 (Civil monetary penalties for fraud); 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7 (Administrative exclusions from participation in Medicare/Medicaid programs for fraud); 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-4 (Administrative subpoena power for the Comptroller General). Other criminal promulgation provisions which are used to combat Medicare and Medicaid fraud, along with hospice fraud, include the following: 18 U.S.C. § 1347 (General condition care fraud criminal statute); 21 U.S.C. §§ 353, 333 (Prescription Drug Marketing Act); 18 U.S.C. § 669 (Theft or Embezzlement in connection with condition Care); 18 U.S.C. § 1035 (False statements relating to condition Care); 18 U.S.C. § 2 (Aiding and Abetting); 18 U.S.C. § 3 (Accessory after the Fact); 18 U.S.C. § 4 (Misprision of a Felony); 18 U.S.C. § 286 (Conspiracy to defraud the Government with respect to Claims); 18 U.S.C. § 287 (False, Fictitious or Fraudulent Claims); 18 U.S.C. § 371 (Criminal Conspiracy); 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (False Statements); 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (Mail Fraud); 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (Wire Fraud); 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (Money Laundering); 18 U.S.C. § 1957 (Money Laundering); and, 18 U.S.C. § 1964 (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations ("Rico")). The False Claims Act (Fca) Hospice fraud whistleblowers may benefit financially under the recompense provisions of the federal False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3732, by bringing false claims suits, also known as qui tam or whistleblower suits, against their employers on behalf of the United States. The plaintiff in a hospice fraud whistleblower suit is also known as a relator. The most coarse Fca provisions upon which hospice fraud qui tam or whistleblower relators rely are found in 31 U.S.C. § 3729: (A) knowingly presents, or causes to be presented, a false or fraudulent claim for cost or approval; (B) knowingly makes, uses, or causes to be made or used, a false narrative or statement material to a false or fraudulent claim; (C) conspires to commit a violation of subparagraph (A), (B), (D), (E), (F), or (G);..., and, (G) knowingly makes, uses, or causes to be made or used, a false narrative or statement material to an promulgation to pay or send money or property to the Government, or knowingly conceals or knowingly and improperly avoids or decreases an promulgation to pay or send money or property to the Government.... There is no requirement to prove exact intent to defraud. Rather, it is only principal to prove actual knowledge of the false claims, false statements, or false records, or the defendant's deliberate indifference or reckless disregard of the truth or falsity of the information. 31 U.S.C. § 3729(b). The Fca anti-retaliation provision protects the hospice whistleblower from retaliation from the hospice when the worker (or a contractor) "is discharged, demoted, suspended, threatened, harassed, or in any other manner discriminated against in the terms and conditions of employment" for taking action to try to stop the fraudulent activity. 31 U.S.C. § 3730(h). A hospice employee's relief includes reinstatement, 2 times the whole of back pay, interest on the back pay, and compensation for any extra damages sustained as a corollary of the discrimination or retaliation, along with litigation costs and inexpensive attorneys' fees. A Sc hospice fraud Fca whistleblower would initially file a disclosure statement, complaint and supporting documents with the U.S. Attorney's Office in Columbia, South Carolina, and the Us Attorney General. After the disclosures are filed, a federal court complaint can be filed. The Sc agency where the frauds occurred, the relator's residence, and the defendant residence, will rule which agency the case will be assigned. There are eleven federal court divisions in South Carolina. Once the case has been filed, the government has 60 days to rule either or not to intervene. During this time, federal government investigators settled in South Carolina will study the claims. If the case complex Medicaid, Sc Medicaid fraud unit investigators will likely become complex as well. If the government intervenes in the case, the U.S. Attorney for South Carolina is ordinarily the lead attorney. If the government does not intervene, the relator's Sc attorney will prosecute the case. In South Carolina, expect a qui tam case to take one to two years to get to trial. Tips on Recognizing Hospice Fraud Schemes The Hhs Office of Inspector normal (Oig) has issued extra Fraud Alerts for fraudulent and abusive practices of hospices. U.S. And South Carolina hospices, patients, hospice employees and whistleblowers, their attorneys and lawyers, should be familiar with these hospice fraud practices. Tips on recognizing hospice frauds in South Carolina and the U.S. Are: • A hospice gift free goods or goods at below store value to induce a nursing home to refer patients to the hospice.
Recent Hospice Fraud promulgation Cases The Doj and U.S. Attorney's Offices have been active in enforcing hospice fraud cases. In 2009, Kaiser Foundation Hospitals settled an Fca lawsuit by paying .8 million to the federal government. The defendant allegedly failed to get written certifications of final illness for a whole of its patients. In 2006, Odyssey Healthcare, a national hospice provider, paid .9 million to rule a qui tam suit for false claims under the Fca. The hospice fraud allegations were generally that Odyssey billed Medicare for providing hospice care to patients when they were not terminally ill and ineligible for Medicare hospice benefits. A Corporate Integrity trade was also a part of the settlement. The hospice fraud qui tam relator received .3 million for blowing the whistle on the defendant. In 2005, Faith Hospice, Inc., settled claims an Fca claim for 0,000. The hospice fraud allegations were generally that Faith Hospice billed Medicare for providing hospice care to patients more than half of whom were not terminally ill. In 2005, Home Hospice of North Texas settled an Fca claim for 0,000 concerning allegations of fraudulently billing Medicare for ineligible hospice patients. In 2000, Michigan osteopath Donald Dreyfuss, who pleaded guilty to criminal fraud charges, along with violation of the Aks for receiving illegal kickbacks from a hospice for recommending the hospice to the staff of his nursing home, settled an Fca suit for million. Conclusion Hospice fraud is a growing problem in South Carolina and throughout the United States. South Carolina hospice patients, hospice employees, and their Sc lawyers and attorneys, should be familiar with the basics of the hospice care industry, hospice eligibility under the Medicare and Medicaid programs, and typical hospice fraud schemes. Hospice organizations should take steps to ensure full compliance with Medicare/Medicaid hospice billing requirements to avoid hospice fraud allegations and Fca litigation. © 2010 Joseph P. Griffith, Jr. I hope you have new knowledge about Attorney. Where you possibly can offer easy use in your day-to-day life. And most significantly, your reaction is passed about Attorney. Read more.. Hospice Fraud - A review For Employees, Whistleblowers, Attorneys, Lawyers and Law Firms. |
Hospice Fraud - A review For Employees, Whistleblowers, Attorneys, Lawyers and Law Firms
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment