Gun operate in the Usa

Gun operate in the Usa

Chicago Car Accident Attorney - Gun operate in the Usa Good evening. Today, I found out about Chicago Car Accident Attorney - Gun operate in the Usa. Which may be very helpful if you ask me therefore you.

Introduction - What we are going to do is politically discuss the issues connected to gun control. What I said. It is not the actual final outcome that the true about Chicago Car Accident Attorney . You look at this article for info on anyone need to know is Chicago Car Accident Attorney . Chicago Car Accident Attorney Does Gun operate cut Crime? - Emphatically no. Never once did it ever do that. Below are any studies that can be researched on the Internet yourself that document the fact that gun operate never reduces crime. New Jersey - In 1996 New Jersey passed what was determined to be the most stringent gun laws in the Usa. Two years later their murder rate went up 46% and their robbery rate about doubled. Hawaii - In 1968 Hawaii passed harsh gun laws. At the time of the legislation their murder rate was 2.4 per 100,000 per year. Nine years later their murder rate had tripled to 7.2 per 100,000. Washington, D.C. - In 1976 they passed a major gun operate law. They even stopped habitancy from owning guns in their homes. Their murder rate went up 134% while the Usa rate for murder dropped 2%. New York City - They have some of the most restrictive gun operate laws in the world. All sales of any sort of gun are restricted and tightly controlled. 20% of all armed robberies in the Usa are committed in New York City and they do not have everywhere close to 20% of the population. This is what happens when the criminals know a inevitable habitancy is unlikely to be unable to defend themselves. Chicago, New York City, Detroit and Washington, D.C.- Each of these cities has accomplished a virtual ban on the inexpressive possession of guns. The Washington D.C laws are being fought out in the appellate courts at present. These four cities have 20% of the homicides in the Usa yet they only make up 6% of the Usa population. This means that restrictive gun operate leads to a tripling of the homicide rate. Some one is going to say wait the habitancy in these areas is why the murder rate is so high. Fine we can look at Arlington, Virginia which is a city right over the Potomac River from Washington D.C with sensible gun operate laws so the habitancy base should not be that different. Their murder rate is 10% of Washington D.C. (7.0 murders per 100,000 habitancy versus 77.8 murders per 100,000 habitancy in Washington D.C). We can also look to Virginia Beach, Va. A colse to city of 400,000. They have sensible gun laws allowing for easy access to firearms and their murder rate is 4.1 per 100,000. Other Effects Non-Restrictive Gun Laws have on Crime - In the Usa in a given year law abiding citizens kills 2,000 to 3,000 criminals. They also wound an additional one 9,000 to 17,000 criminals a year. This is a allowance in the load of violent crimes the government must arrest, detain, prosecute and imprison. It also sends a strong signal to the other would be criminals. Criminals worry far more about an encounter with an armed law abiding habitancy than a policeman. Police are most likely going to be polite about asking the criminal to drop their weapon and submit. The habitancy in fear of protecting himself and his house is going to be much more prone to firing his weapon than a police officer. Criminals' most fear is running into an armed victim when committing a crime. This was based on a study of 1874 felons from 10 states. In this study 38% of these felons said at least one time they had been scared off, shot at or wounded by an armed victim. Only 1% of the time do criminals take a gun away from a victim, yet 10% of the police officers that are shot, are shot with their own guns. Police officers are slow to shoot and the criminals know this and thus are more fearful of an armed citizen. inexpressive citizens kill three times as many criminals as police do. Remember if man is assaulting you or robbing you or your house the police will likely only be taking a description not encountering the criminals. It is the habitancy who needs all the help and assistance of weapons to survive the criminal encounter. Why Do Governments Seek Gun Control? - Fear! They are afraid of losing operate over the population. The prefect state of affairs for a police state is the confiscation of all confidentially owned firearms. Then the possibility of an overthrow of the government goes down by about 99.9%. They never want partial gun controls like only engine guns or "assault type weapons" to be banned. They want all the confidentially owned guns gone. The partial gun operate is the Salami theory. You keep cutting a slice away until there is nothing left. The only fancy for gun operate is to make room for a totalitarian government, nothing else. Sometime there are habitancy ignorantly confused who preserve gun operate reasoning it will do something to make the world a safer place to live. Play with these habitancy and say when the government disarms then you will. Tell them to chase the government and tell them to have the government give up their guns for police leaving only the troops armed. Use the British Bobbies who used to be unarmed as an example. Tell them the Cayman Island and Nassau police are unarmed. Have them call for the disarming of the police. Play with them. Have fun. Every time the police shoot man accidentally tell them to call for the disarming of the police. How Would Gun operate Happen - Well Obama showed it to you recently. They were beginning to introduce gun operate bills again. We do not know how aggressively they will push them this time. Nothing in these bills will do any practical good in terms of reducing crime, not a single thing. They also increase the penalties each time. So if it would happen what would it look like. Ok there would be a bill that say banned all attack weapons. The bill would say the attorney general can add any gun to the list he wanted. Over time he would keep adding guns to test the social response. The banned guns would be prohibited from being sold at first. They would leave .22 caliber single shot rifles and single shot shotguns until the end to satisfy the call for hunting guns. Then the banned guns would come to be illegal to own even if they were grandfathered in, registered whatever. This would be something like turn them in or face 20 years in prison for each gun plus a 0,000 fine for each gun. I am serious on the penalties. No one would be arrival to anyone's house to get the guns for a long time. They would wait for man to get shot with a .22 caliber gun and then say these too need to be banned. They all the time love to call for new restrictive laws after a shooting crime. Do that back to them. Every time you see the police abuse a man with a taser call for them to be banned and not used by the police. They will soon stop when their own tactics gets turned on them. Now the habitancy have their guns and they can run colse to quoting Charleston Heston and his out of my cold dead hands slogan. The next stage is anytime the local police get into a house like to acknowledge to a burglary, a domestic abuse call, a noisy party whatever and they see the guns then man gets to go to jail for a long time. The word soon gets out. If you think the habitancy that own guns are going to like get together, carry guns and march on Washington D.C. Armed to the teeth to interrogate gun laws be repealed you need to get some counseling. You will never see this. If whatever like this were ever going to happen it would have happened in 1968 with the first serious federal gun operate law. This came on the heels of the Kennedy assassination. What did that have to do with gun operate laws anyway? I am going to say some things about how it used to be. If any of you find this too wild to be true verify it. Find old issues of Guns and Ammo magazines and read the ads. You were able to buy guns mail order over state lines before 1968. There were a few states that prohibited this but that was it. You were able to buy engine guns fairly easily. You were able to freely buy what they call destructive devices. Boys ant-tank rifles (Boys was a manufacturers name) were being sold for .00 with bipods and all. The ads used to say for the jackrabbit that got away. This rifle fires a .51 caliber round that is sufficient on lightly armored tanks. Bazookas were a mail order item as were mortars. Armor piercing ammo was freely available until the late 1970's or early 1980's. They had lovely armor piercing fully jacketed .45 auto rounds that would pierce engine blocks, let alone bullet resistant vests. Guns were not registered except for a few states and cities that did this. Those yellow forms came along with the 1968 gun operate law. This was when guns were fairly well available and by mail order. An armed society is a polite society. Criminals are not polite. Response To New Restrictive Gun operate Laws - We will now address how the habitancy will be likely to respond. This is hypothetical and based on investment only. No one can predict what the habitancy will do with any accuracy including the government. There are many mitigating circumstances that will come to bear on the hearts and minds of those affected. In this hypothetical scenario the habitancy in our concept are going to not physically resist new guns laws instead just sort of go with the flow and verbally oppose them only, for the most part. They will bury their guns and ammo in the woods. They will hide them inside the walls, under the floorboards etc. They will say things like well when the time comes etc. At last the local police will start arresting habitancy when they scrutinize the guns in vehicles, in houses, informants (the maid, the plumber, the cable Tv guy, the alarm business guy) tell them about them and so forth. These habitancy will be arrested and get probably 10 years for each gun plus immense fines like 0,000 for each gun. There will be calls for amnesty asking habitancy to just turn the guns in and walk away free. Many will do this out of fear. There will be no revolutionary troops to join and resist. After a year or two there will be raids on houses. They will use devices to see images behind the sheetrock. They will use metal detectors in the yards and land. When they find a gun after the owner does not turn it over when they show up they will throw the book at the person. They will take his house as accomplices. All will be in jail for many years. The fines will cause them to lose their homes, cars and assets. They will be destroyed completely. Only thing worse would be to kill them. Those with guns inexpressive in the woods will be questioned as to where their guns are. They will probably be expensed with some crime for not reporting a stolen gun within 72 hours, which is found in Hr 45 the latest gun operate bill (not law yet). So when they say the guns were lost or stolen they get expensed with the crime of not reporting this and get serious jail time for each gun. Gun registration is the prelude to the confiscation, nothing else. The reporting the lost and stolen guns in 72 hours is the fix against you saying you lost the guns when they come to take them away. Those with unregistered guns will be able to hide them in the woods. There are many ways to do this securely and preserve the firearm. If the weapon is wiped free of prints and any blood like from getting pinched by the slide (think Dna) then this man should be safe if the weapons are found and not traceable to him in any way. What good is it doing them to have the guns buried in the woods? It is just a psychological game they are playing with themselves. Once a man came to Confucius and said I had a jar full of money buried in the woods. I went to dig it up to check on it and the money was gone. What should I do? Confucius said put rocks in the jar, bury it again and make believe the money is still there. It would be very hazardous for these habitancy to even go and check on their weapons and they probably never will. I do not think there will be any rising up of gun owners. They are not going to engage the police in active firefights to keep their guns. The guns will just go away and the police state will be in full swing. What the Police Are Missing - Police do not see their role in the police state correctly or even close to it. They miss the bigger picture. To them it is a status job, the pay is good and the perks are big. Police and their families get out from traffic tickets. Ask any law promulgation officer you may know well. This includes spouses, children, brothers, sisters, and parents. In many departments they even have limited gold and silver courtesy badges they give their relatives. The police and their families get convenient treatment with crisis reports, ouch if you are the other driver. They have a lot of convenient treatment letting them get away with things quarterly habitancy do not get away with. They ordinarily cannot get away with major crimes. Police carry guns all over the Usa without a carry permit. They can carry on airplanes if they are Federal Officers. They can carry guns in government buildings, in stadiums, schools etc. If they are in their own jurisdiction they can get away with whatever short of major felonies with victims. Police like this treatment. It gives them status and pride. It teaches them there are only three classes of people. The ruling class to them is not the Federal preserve Bank; they would not know what that is. It is the senators, congressmen, mayors, supervisors, judges etc. They know these habitancy can exert their power and work on and make their life miserable in many ways. They leave these habitancy alone. Then there are police, which they all the time leave alone. Then come you the citizen. You pay their wage and they have no respect for you. You do not matter in that you have no power to do whatever against them and you cannot retaliate. They are there to operate you. The Taser is the latest police state tactic to be adopted. If a man doe not verbally snap to and acknowledge to a verbal command of a police officer like get out of the car, stand here, sit down, move here etc they taser them. The police do not know they are conditioning the populace to acknowledge to the police blindly without reasoning or face painful consequences. I do not indeed know what they think. I guess they think it is proper to interrogate such respect and operate over those they are supposed to protect. Most habitancy that get tasered are complex in a victimless non-violent crime. This makes it worse. The police are not aware of any of this. They are in their own limited world. They do not worry too much about the financial crisis in that they think there will all the time be work for them. Wait until the layoffs sink in later this year. Their attitude will change for the worse. They will do whatever their handlers ask to keep their jobs. The police do not think they are there to safe and serve. They are there to operate the populace and safe the ruling class and each other. Can you remember when police had nice government aid looking uniforms, revolvers, long wooden sticks and helped habitancy change flat tires. Now they look like storm troopers, wear black uniforms and masks, never help whatever with anything, have high tech weapons and attack fear and terror into the hearts of those that have taste with them. This is not being done by occasion it is planned to attack fear into you of the police who used to be there to serve you. The police used to be hard on armed robbers, rapists, burglars, muggers and real criminals. Now most of the habitancy in the prisons are there for crimes that are victimless. A government statue is not a victim. When the Police State Flourishes What Is It Like For The Police? - Well this is something they do not consider. Let us say gun operate has been accomplished and inexpressive possession of guns is historical. So the habitancy are no longer a threat. Who will the paranoid rulers fear next? They are all the time paranoid because they do not rule by favorite support. Ever see the army of bodyguards they have now, this is nothing. You got it, the police and troops is what they will fear the most. They have the weapons, the access, the connection inherent to build etc. Dream police leaving their guns in their lockers when going off shift. This is how it will be. No inexpressive guns for police anymore. Internal protection investigations will come to be a lifestyle. There will not be any more lawsuits against the government. The Internal protection troops will be super cops trained to resent the police, take benefit of them and rule them by fear and harshness. What the police do the habitancy now, is what the internal protection troops will do to the police then only worse since there will not be any consequences for their actions. There will be mandatory polygraph exams. Long interrogations. Police homes and cars being searched. Their phones and email being tapped. They will be followed. Other police constantly being questioned about their colleagues. The role model is the Ss Hitler had. Remember who tried to kill Hitler, the troops on any occasions. The troops will also be handled harshly but they are much more indeed controlled due to the nature of the troops but their internal protection troops will constantly be engaged in a war of terror against them. The internal protection troops will have to get results or else they will be determined ineffective so one way or an additional one they will be discovering sedition, spying, attempts to revolt, steal, commit criminal acts etc. The police will be policed very harshly. They will in turn be harsh towards the population. The police do not see any of this coming. The Federal Police are in the same boat as the local police. They will come to be more and more entrusted to police the police and safe the state as time goes on. There will not be much point in protecting the state from an unarmed populace so guess who they will focus on - the others who can have access to guns - the troops and police. The internal protection troops the federal police have will rein terror on them as well. They will have to locate plots to keep their jobs and show they serve a purpose. Doom and gloom. Will This Scenario Be Likely? - In our concept no. We ascribe to the breaking up of the Usa due to financial collapse similar to the Ussr in the 1980's. It looks like Obama is afraid to push forward with gun operate legislation just now. This can be a ruse while they work hard to get it passed quietly without opposition until it is too late but unlikely. Obama has to avow order in the face of the financial collapse, which is already happened, and getting worse by the day. New opposition from 25 million gun owners is not something him and Billary need right now. The countries in the world do not trust the Us and their dollar and they are working fast to replace the dollar as the world preserve currency. Anything like this will hurt the Usa and throw them into hyperinflation. The Usa will have to start buying foreign currency to make purchases abroad and the transfer rate will be bad for the Usd. Gun operate is a slow freight train that takes years to supervene even from where they are today. The Usa Government is indeed fighting for its prolonged existence and hoping to keep its role as a superpower and the world's policeman. I would say they have two chances - slim and none. They destroyed themselves with their idiotic greedy monetary practices. The descriptive term should be - Dead Country Walking. I hope you receive new knowledge about Chicago Car Accident Attorney . Where you possibly can put to utilization in your life. And most significantly, your reaction is passed. Read more.. Gun operate in the Usa.